A royal feud is growing between UK government leaders and the nation’s future king after Prince Charles named a controversial new policy Sending asylum seekers to Rwanda is ‘horrendous’.

Members of British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government have warned the Prince of Wales to stop interfering in public policy over fears the political monarch could cause a constitutional crisis, the Guardian reports. Sunday hours.

Members of the Royal Family released a statement on Saturday in response to the warning that Charles, 73, would be ‘politically neutral’ when he inherits the throne, even as courtiers said the prince intended to be more open than her mother, the London newspaper reported. He said.

Charles’ comments came after the country’s Supreme Court ruled on Friday to uphold the asylum policy. The platform said the migrants’ first trip to the British African Commonwealth was scheduled for Tuesday. The prince is said to have repeatedly spoken out against the decision, saying he was “more disappointed than that”.

The split between Downing Street and Clarence Bliss is said to have arisen from Johnson’s “disrespectful” behavior towards Charles when they first met, according to the article, explaining that the Prime Minister was “uncomfortable with punctuality”, while the heir to the throne “couldn’t tolerate the delay.”

The battle royal comes days before Johnson and Charles travel to Rwanda for the Commonwealth Heads of Government Conference, according to the newspaper.

Prince Charles is an ornament to our public life, but it wouldn’t be so charming if he tried to act the same way when he was king. A senior cabinet official told the newspaper that it would raise serious constitutional issues.

“Many of his views on architecture and gardening are interesting, and I’d always be willing to listen to them privately. But that’s very different from him doing public speaking as king. The genius of the queen is that most of us have no idea what she’s thinking.

Other ministers were more outspoken, with one telling the paper: ‘Although this type of interference will be tolerated when he is Prince of Wales, it will not be the same when he becomes King.”

“The problem with Charles is that he thinks he has to be interesting and he thinks people are interested in what he thinks. He seems to have misunderstood the role,” said another.

The newspaper said Charles often irritated the political class by frequently writing memos to ministers and talking about political issues in the past. A report that he obtained secret departmental documents for decades has also sparked controversy among lawmakers.

In 2018, Charles reportedly told the BBC he would act within ‘constitutional standards’ after his coronation and said it was ‘not so stupid’ to defy UK law, which requires monarchs to be politically neutral and prevent them from voting.